Best Audience Response & Live Polling Tools (2026)
Hands-on testing across 7 tools. Real scenarios. Honest results.
Author transparency note:
This guide was written by Poll Everywhere. We've tested each tool ourselves and tried to give an honest account of where competitors excel — and where we fall short. If you're deciding between tools, we'd rather you make the right call than the wrong one.
Any of these tools can run a poll. The differences emerge when conditions change: large audiences, strict IT requirements, academic reporting workflows, or live sessions where improvisation isn't an option. This guide covers what those differences actually look like across real use cases.
Compare tools - Pricing - Hands-on testing
What matters most to you?
Any tool here can handle basic polling. The differences show up when one of these priorities matters a lot. Find your situation and skip ahead.
Polished design that looks great out of the box
→ Consider Mentimeter for one-off or executive-facing presentations where visual quality and predictability matter most.
→ Consider SlidesWith for fully interactive, design-first slide decks where engagement is built into the presentation itself.
A zero-learning-curve during live sessions
→ Consider Poll Everywhere for a fast start with sensible defaults — especially when preparing just ahead of a session. AI-assisted poll creation speeds up setup.
→ Consider Mentimeter for low-stress live use where avoiding surprises matters more than speed.
Department or org-wide standardization
→ Consider Poll Everywhere and Slido for enterprise-grade deployment. Slido is particularly strong in WebEx environments.
→ Consider Poll Everywhere and Wooclap in academic contexts. Both are recognized Canvas Partners with broad LMS and LTI 1.3 support.
Unlimited participation (free or near-free)
→ Consider Poll Everywhere's all-access trial for short-term needs, or Vevox for ongoing use with minimal participant constraints.
Powerful integrations with tools you already use
→ PowerPoint-native workflows (polls run inside slides, not alongside them): Consider Poll Everywhere and Vevox.
→ LMS integrations for higher ed reporting and grade passback: Consider Poll Everywhere and Wooclap.
→ Enterprise meeting tools (Teams, WebEx, Google Slides): Consider Poll Everywhere and Slido.
Gamified engagement for younger audiences
→ Kahoot! is purpose-built for this. No other tool in this category matches its energy for K–12 and quiz-style training.
Quick comparison
The table below summarizes key dimensions across all seven tools. Scroll right on mobile, or use the jump links above to go deeper on any tool.
|
Tool |
Best for |
Free audience limit |
Security certifications |
LMS / LTI |
Works inside slides |
|
Poll Everywhere |
Enterprise, higher ed, PowerPoint-heavy workflows |
~40–50 participants |
SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 + 27701 ✓ |
LTI 1.3 |
Yes (native plug-in) |
|
Mentimeter |
Polished one-off presentations and meetings |
~40–50 participants |
None publicly listed |
None |
Limited (unstable plug-in) |
|
Slido |
Corporate Q&A, town halls, WebEx environments |
3 polls/session max |
SOC 2, ISO 27001 + 27701 ✓ |
None |
Yes (add-in) |
|
Kahoot! |
Gamified quizzes, icebreakers, K–12 |
Trial-based |
Not publicly disclosed |
LTI 1.3 |
No |
|
Vevox |
Anonymous participation, low-friction events |
Generous (limited Qs) |
ISO 27001 ✓ |
LTI 1.3 |
Yes |
|
SlidesWith |
Presentation-first facilitated team meetings |
10 participants |
None publicly listed |
None |
Yes (slide-native) |
|
Wooclap |
Assessment-style classroom and training use |
3 polls/session max |
None publicly listed |
LTI 1.3 |
No |
Will this work in my setting?
Most tools work well in at least one of these scenarios. The differences show up when conditions change — larger audiences, stricter IT environments, or the need to reuse sessions across cohorts.
|
Scenario |
Works well when… |
Breaks down when… |
|
Teaching a Physics I section |
Students join anonymously, polls reuse week to week, LaTeX renders for technical content, no accounts required |
Participation caps hit mid-class, setup takes longer than a natural lecture pause, students must authenticate |
|
All Physics courses at a university |
Content shared across instructors, results export cleanly for accreditation, LMS integration is robust, IT involvement is optional |
Licensing forces department-wide commitment early, LMS integration is shallow or brittle, admin controls reduce instructor flexibility |
|
Team meeting |
Polls launch with no prep, the tool doesn't interrupt meeting flow, everyone joins in seconds on their own device |
Switching apps kills momentum, poll creation feels heavier than the discussion itself, results aren't immediately actionable |
|
Company-wide Q&A |
Participation scales to hundreds or thousands, questions can be anonymous and moderated, voting surfaces real priorities |
Question or participant limits are reached, moderation tools are locked behind enterprise tiers, access requires corporate logins |
|
New employee onboarding |
Sessions reuse across cohorts, engagement data is easy to review, the experience feels welcoming rather than surveilled |
Setup time outweighs perceived value, new hires struggle to join, admin restrictions reduce spontaneity |
|
Presenting at a conference |
Audience joins instantly via QR or short link, Wi-Fi variability is tolerated, no accounts or prior setup required |
Tools assume repeat users or logged-in attendees, network hiccups cause visible failures, limits aren't clear until too late |
Best polling tool for higher education
Best polling tool for corporate town halls and all-hands meetings
Best polling tool for conferences and events
What we found — tool by tool
These assessments are based on hands-on testing. We've tried to reflect what users actually experience, not what marketing pages say. Poll Everywhere is listed first because we wrote this guide — apply the same skepticism to our self-assessment as to our assessments of others.
Feedback themes are drawn from G2, Capterra, and community forums. Volume labels (high / moderate / low) reflect the frequency with which themes appeared, not individual review scores.
Poll Everywhere
Best fit:
Large recurring classes, enterprise meetings, and professional presentations where live polling needs to run inside slide decks and scale reliably over time. Strongest fit when LMS integration, security compliance, and organizational governance matter.
Why people switch to it:
Users switch to Poll Everywhere for its PowerPoint and Google Slides native integration (polls run inside the deck, not in a separate tab), strong LMS/LTI support for grade passback and roster sync, and enterprise-grade security credentials. It's a long-standing choice in higher education.
Why people switch away:
Users leave when the interface feels heavier than their use case requires, or when the free plan's limits are hit before value is proven. Some users note that AI-assisted poll creation is better used in preparation than live — improvising under time pressure adds risk.
Top praise points:
- PowerPoint / Keynote integration – "I can build everything right into my slides — no extra tabs or apps." (G2, high volume)
- Strong presence in higher ed – "We've used Poll Everywhere for years in lectures. It's reliable and familiar." (Faculty blog, medium volume)
- Wide range of question formats – "Multiple choice, clickable images, word clouds — it supports everything I need." (Capterra, high volume)
- Real-time updates – "I love seeing the audience's input update live on screen." (YouTube review, medium volume)
Top concerns:
- Limited free plan – "You hit the ceiling quickly — lots of features are locked behind paid tiers." (G2, moderate volume)
- Setup friction – "Getting students signed in and answering the first time takes too long." (Faculty forum, anecdotal)
- Past reports of lag (2024) appear to have been addressed in 2.0 – "Sometimes it lags or fails to load, especially with large groups." (Reddit, moderate volume — historical)
Security: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 + 27701. LTI 1.3 Advantage. Canvas Partner.
Mentimeter
Best fit:
Polished, one-off presentations and professional meetings where visual quality, ease of use, and low setup time matter more than deep integrations or high-volume scale.
Why people switch to it:
Users switch to Mentimeter for its intuitive interface and the way it transforms presentations into visually engaging experiences. A polished look, wide range of interactive types (polls, quizzes, word clouds), and low learning curve are the most common reasons.
Why people switch away:
The most common reasons to leave: tight free plan limits (2–3 questions per session), no LMS integrations making reporting manual, and a PowerPoint plug-in that is widely reported as unstable and unusable.
Top praise points:
- Zero learning curve – "Almost frictionless from the user's point of view." (Capterra, high volume)
- High audience engagement – "Live polls, word clouds, quizzes — this helps keep people involved." (G2, high volume)
- Wide interactive features – "A one-stop shop." (Capterra, high volume)
- Professional visuals – "Far slicker and more professional looking." (Capterra, high volume)
- Anonymous feedback – "Anonymous responses encourage honest participation." (G2, high volume)
Top concerns:
- Unstable PowerPoint integration – "The plug-in crashes all the time and is unusable." (Capterra, high volume)
- Limited customization – "Branding and design customization is limited compared to other tools." (G2, high volume)
- Free plan walls – "Only 2–3 slides per session is just not enough." (Reddit, low volume)
No publicly available SOC 2 or ISO 27001 information. No LMS or LTI integrations.
Slido
Best fit:
Company-wide meetings, town halls, and events where moderated Q&A, anonymous questions, and audience voting matter more than visual interactivity or slide-native polling.
Why people switch to it:
Slido is the strongest tool in this group for live Q&A moderation. The upvote system, question filtering, and WebEx integration make it a natural fit for enterprise all-hands meetings and event-scale Q&A.
Why people switch away:
Users move away when they need more visual interaction formats (word clouds, ranking, quizzes), deeper education use, or when pricing doesn't work for smaller teams. It's purpose-built for corporate events, not classrooms.
Top praise points:
- Best-in-class Q&A moderation – "The upvote system and moderation are excellent — no spam, best questions surface." (G2, high volume)
- Integrates well with slide tools – "Works beautifully with Google Slides and PowerPoint." (YouTube, high engagement)
- Professional for large audiences – "We use Slido in all-hands meetings — it feels polished and trustworthy." (Reddit, moderate volume)
- Easy audience access – "No app needed — people join with a code and it just works." (Capterra, high volume)
Top concerns:
- Not great for teaching – "It's clearly designed for meetings and events — not classrooms." (Faculty forum, anecdotal)
- Limited interaction types – "I wish it had more visual formats like word clouds or ranking." (G2, moderate volume)
- Expensive for smaller orgs – "We hit a paywall fast — basic features are gated behind Pro." (Reddit, moderate volume)
SOC 2, ISO 27001 + 27701. No LMS or LTI integrations.
Kahoot!
Best fit:
Gamified quizzes, icebreakers, and learning activities — especially in K–12, early undergraduate, and onboarding scenarios — where energy and competition drive engagement more than discussion or depth.
Why people switch to it:
Kahoot! is adopted for its game-show energy. Leaderboards, scoring, and visual feedback can motivate participation in ways other tools can't. Strong brand recognition means no onboarding required.
Why people switch away:
Users grow out of Kahoot! when they need open discussion, flexible question types, or quieter professional formats. The competitive format is widely seen as too chaotic or juvenile for serious business and academic contexts.
Top praise points:
- Fun and energetic – "It's like turning your class into a game show." (G2, high volume)
- Great for younger learners – "My students love it and ask for it — they stay focused." (Reddit, high volume)
- Easy to use and run – "I can build a quiz in 5 minutes and run it with 30+ students." (Capterra, high volume)
- Strong brand recognition – "Everyone knows Kahoot!, so no onboarding needed." (YouTube, high engagement)
Top concerns:
- Too noisy for serious topics – "Students get caught up in the game and miss the content." (Reddit, moderate volume)
- Surface-level engagement – "It's fun, but doesn't lead to deep thinking." (G2, moderate volume)
- Limited use cases outside gamification – "Great for icebreakers, but I can't use it across a course." (Faculty blog, medium volume)
Security certifications: not publicly disclosed. LTI 1.3 Advantage support listed.
Vevox
Best fit:
Anonymous participation in lectures, meetings, or events where low friction and unlimited polling matter more than visual polish. Strong university and Microsoft ecosystem fit.
Why people switch to it:
Vevox draws users who need both audience engagement and secure, anonymous Q&A. Known for strong Microsoft integration and university licensing partnerships. Generous poll counts on the free tier reduce anxiety about hitting limits mid-session.
Why people switch away:
Users find the interface dated compared to Mentimeter or Slido. Pricing is difficult for individual users outside of institutional licenses. Limited brand recognition means extra setup when audiences haven't heard of it.
Top praise points:
- Excellent in educational settings – "Students can answer anonymously without pressure." (Faculty blog, medium volume)
- Strong PowerPoint integration – "It works right inside our slides — no tab switching." (Capterra, high volume)
- Well-executed anonymous Q&A – "Moderation without censorship — names only appear if chosen." (G2, moderate volume)
Top concerns:
- Interface feels dated – "Not as smooth as Slido or Mentimeter." (Reddit, low volume)
- Pricing structure – "Built for big orgs. Not for individuals outside a university license." (G2, moderate volume)
- Limited brand awareness – "People ask what Vevox is — there's more setup required." (Faculty forum, anecdotal)
Security: ISO 27001. LTI 1.3 support.
SlidesWith
Best fit:
Facilitated meetings and presentations where interaction is built into the slides themselves and the tone needs to remain professional rather than game-like. Best for internal team use.
Why people switch to it:
SlidesWith attracts users who want a clean, frictionless way to embed polls and Q&A directly in their decks. No separate tool to manage — interaction is part of the presentation from the start.
Why people switch away:
Users leave when they need more robust poll formats (ranking, word clouds), stronger analytics, or classroom-oriented features. The 10-participant free limit is a hard wall for most use cases.
Top praise points:
- Frictionless for meetings – "The most frictionless way I've found to add live polls to a deck." (Product Hunt, low–moderate volume)
- Clean, simple interface – "The UI doesn't distract the audience." (Reddit, low volume)
- Easy Q&A upvoting – "People can upvote questions without derailing the meeting." (YouTube transcript, low volume)
Top concerns:
- Limited poll types – "I wish it had more than basic multiple choice and open-ended." (Reddit, low volume)
- Minimal analytics – "Not much post-session data compared to Slido or Vevox." (Capterra, low volume)
- No education focus – "Clearly made for business — not useful in my classroom." (Faculty forum, anecdotal)
No publicly available security certifications. No LMS or LTI integrations. Free plan caps at 10 participants.
Wooclap
Best fit:
Course-based teaching and training where assessment-style questions, LMS integration, and learning outcomes are central. Strong fit for Moodle and Blackboard environments.
Why people switch to it:
Wooclap appeals to instructors looking for a pedagogically oriented tool. Deeper question types (open-ended, drag-and-drop, ranking), LMS integration, and education-specific design make it a natural fit for academic workflows.
Why people switch away:
Users move away when they need slicker visuals for public-facing presentations, or encounter friction from a less intuitive interface. Limited brand recognition requires more audience onboarding.
Top praise points:
- Built for education – "Exit tickets, open questions, real student feedback — anonymously." (Faculty blog, medium volume)
- Strong LMS integration – "Connects directly with Moodle and Blackboard with learning goal linking." (YouTube review, medium volume)
- Wide question variety – "Open-ended, drag and drop, ranking — not just MCQs and polls." (Capterra, moderate volume)
- Anonymous feedback – "Students can answer without feeling exposed." (Reddit, low volume)
Top concerns:
- Less intuitive UI – "Students are sometimes confused by how to join." (Capterra, moderate volume)
- Lower aesthetic appeal – "More functional than sleek — not ideal for public talks." (Reddit, low volume)
- Limited brand recognition – "People haven't heard of it, so there's more explaining to do." (Faculty forum, anecdotal)
No publicly available security certifications. LTI 1.3 support. Canvas Partner.
Pricing and usage limits
Pricing across these tools varies widely — not just in cost, but in how and when limits appear. The most important question isn't the price. It's what breaks first as usage grows.
Quick reference table:
|
Tool |
Free plan breaks at |
Basic paid plan |
Top / enterprise tier |
|
Poll Everywhere |
~40–50 participants |
Up to 700 participants; reporting + LMS |
SSO, SCIM, advanced admin, unlimited |
|
Mentimeter |
~40–50 response limit/month |
"Unlimited" responses; limited sharing |
SSO, branding, advanced analytics |
|
Slido |
3 polls/session max |
Up to 200 participants; basic reports |
SSO, advanced moderation, WebEx deep integration |
|
Kahoot! |
Trial-based; strong nudges to paid |
Larger audiences; more question types |
Up to 800 participants; LMS, admin |
|
Vevox |
Generous polls; limited question types |
Expanded Qs, reporting, branding |
Enterprise SSO, advanced analytics |
|
SlidesWith |
10 participants |
250+ participants |
Branding; limited enterprise controls |
|
Wooclap |
3 polls/session max |
Unlimited interactions; LMS reports |
SSO, AI tools, advanced LMS reporting |
How far can you go on your own?
Tools with meaningful ongoing free use
- Vevox — generous poll count and audience size on the free tier; limited question types
- Poll Everywhere and Mentimeter — workable for small, infrequent audiences (~40–50 participants)
- SlidesWith — small, presentation-centric sessions (10-participant cap)
Tools with optional full-feature trials
- Poll Everywhere — 30-day all-access trial
- Kahoot! — trial-based access with strong upgrade prompts
Tools where free is mostly exploratory
- Slido — 3 polls per session cap makes the free tier useful only for evaluation
- Wooclap — same 3-poll cap; free is effectively a test drive
When does procurement get involved?
Procurement typically enters when an organization needs SSO or SCIM provisioning, centralized license management, advanced sharing and audit controls, formal data privacy agreements, very large audience sizes, or dedicated support.
One useful reality check: most users don't gradually grow plans. Individuals and small teams pick a plan and stay. Enterprise adoption typically happens separately — either consolidating many individual users or as a fresh procurement-led decision. When SMB usage does precede enterprise adoption, the timeline is usually measured in years, not months.
Watch us use each tool for the first time
These are unedited, first-time Loom recordings — no scripts, no cleanup, no retakes. The pauses, misclicks, and mid-session recoveries are intentional. They show what using each tool actually feels like when you're live and something doesn't go as planned.
Our CEO tried each tool fresh (excepting our own) — no prior session, no prep — to capture the genuine post-login experience a new user encounters. When watching, look for: how many steps it takes to launch the first poll; whether anything must be enabled before participants can respond; what trips us up; how easy it is to recover from a mistake; and whether joining as a participant "just works."
Video walkthroughs (one per tool):
Poll Everywhere
Video transcript – Poll Everywhere
Okay, it's time for Poll Everywhere. I'm on a casual Friday here — not the same day as the other recordings. I'm already familiar with this product, so it's not really fair for me to do a blind run-through, but I'll do my best to do a stream-of-consciousness walkthrough.
0:20
We're starting out after sign-up and login. We're going to ask about turtles again — that's our running theme. We'll go for a Competition, which is the gamified version with leaderboards.
1:09
We could make a series of polls as well. These questions are AI-generated — trivia about the Ninja Turtles theme song. Not quite what we wanted, but we can run through it. You could edit the questions or adjust the AI prompt to improve output.
2:00
For the purpose of comparison I'm going to go ahead and present, and I'm joining with another device. Responding as "the helpful zebra." Let's see — Donatello — and the helpful zebra is in the lead.
2:48
My mistake — I started on the final slide. Let me jump back. Okay, so now we have the competition loaded. Leo. Zebra is ahead. Points are allotted based on response time. The radar visualization looks good.
3:37
You get confetti and a leaderboard at the end. There are a lot of little things you can do in a competition — showing who's connected, for example. You can also export polls to PowerPoint, view questions and correct responses, and pull reporting.
4:48
Let's look at billing quickly. We're on the Teams trial for the first 30 days, then we drop to Intro — 40-person audience size, some AI prompts per month, unlimited questions. Higher tiers increase audience size, reporting capabilities, AI access, and branding. Pricing feels fairly competitive with the others we've tested.
5:36
That's Poll Everywhere.
Slido
Video transcript – Slido
Alright, so Slido — the last one we're doing. We've done quite a few. We signed up, we're saving for work, and I'm not sure if I'll be managing this license.
0:20
What do I want to achieve? Form. Let's make something. We'll call it TurtlesLikeTheOthers. A few days duration — that's fine.
0:40
We've got an AI option — good. Let's see if we can make these interactions come together. Okay, a series of polls is showing as one poll, but I think this part's correct. We can add one more. Good options here.
1:44
Go ahead and present. We get a loading screen. Let's get joined up. Slido's loading on the other device.
2:06
I need to send my response. Okay, that changes the order here. We're sorted. We get the join instructions. Selected the wrong thing — let's say Best Villain, Bebop, send.
2:39
Sorts this out. We can hide results, change polls, enable Q&A, show the Q&A. That's cool. I have to switch to this tab to see it — that makes sense. That's Slido. Goes back to the poll — TurtleVillain.
3:17
Let's check the upgrade options. On free we can have three polls but 100 participants — Vevox might be a little more generous on the free plan. The paid tier gets you 200 participants. Goes up to 5,000 at the top. One-time or annual billing.
4:10
That's Slido. Pretty well integrated with WebEx in particular — it's a Cisco product now. We've now done Menti, WooClap, Kahoot, SlidesWith, Poll Everywhere, Vevox, and Slido.
Vevox
Video transcript – Vevox
Alright, this is Vevox. We're going to try to make another set of polls about the Ninja Turtles. We just got logged in — this is where we landed after setting up a new account. I'll say I'm a team lead.
0:22
We have to verify an email, but let's see if we can create a session without doing that first. I'll give it a name and try to proceed.
0:51
We've got this. We can start the session. I'll hit "choice" and add a question — which turtle is the best? One selection allowed. We'll add one more: which weapon — nunchucks or bo staff?
2:00
Let's start the session and present full screen. Joining up via QR code. We're connected to Turtles. Which turtle's the best? A vote — and I didn't have to submit. I like that.
2:44
How do we see results? Close the poll. The arrow doesn't navigate to next — a bit confusing. "Close this poll" just means we're done with that one, not the whole session. Good.
3:37
We see choices for weapons. Nunchucks is probably the coolest answer. We can show Q&A — nothing there, but I can type something. That works.
4:14
Fairly impressive given we're on the free plan and haven't even validated the email. Let's look at pricing. Can't upgrade until we activate. Similar price per user. Free forever plan allows 100 participants and unlimited polls. They claim an AI poll creator but I couldn't find it — probably my mistake. Larger plans unlock more poll options and support levels.
5:15
That's Vevox. On to the next one.
SlidesWith
Video transcript – SlidesWith
Alright, Slides With Friends. This came up after signup. There's a countdown — not sure if it logs me out. I'll jump on another device to confirm my email. Confirmed — we're in.
0:34
I don't have a slide deck, so maybe I'm ready to play? I can browse popular templates. Looking at one — "Weekend Activity" — people type words rather than choose options. I can see that working. Let's look at upgrading. 50 people on starter. Unlimited slides and events. I like the design — fresh, its own thing.
1:36
Back to create a new one. TMNT Best. We get color palettes — green for the turtles, makes sense. Let's go "comicky." Actually, let's go "professional." Starting now.
2:19
Got it. Big pink button makes sense. No obvious AI creation here, so we'll do things manually. Going with multiple choice — who's the best turtle? Four options: Leo, and the answer is Raph.
3:25
One more question — best weapon. Swords, Bo Staff. Let's launch. Some options are premium only — unclear which ones. It lets us proceed anyway.
4:54
Joining up. It wants my email to join as a participant. Okay, I'm in as RG. Presenting now — I Like Snowy. Who's the best turtle? I made a selection and I can see that I voted — good feedback. Correct answer was Raph.
5:57
Which weapon is the best? Going through the full sequence. Something unexpected happened — unclear what I triggered. Sword's kind of the coolest. Nunchucks pretty cool too. I didn't add a score summary slide — that's what was missing. You can place score slides throughout.
7:04
I like some of the styling here — it looks pretty buttoned up. A few things I didn't expect but all made sense once figured out. Mainly comes down to how many people you're hosting. Nice work from SlidesWith.
Kahoot!
Video transcript – Kahoot!
Alright, this is Kahoot. We're going to make polls about the Ninja Turtles, similar to the other platforms. Kahoot is known for gamification, bright colors, and K–12 use — but they have a lot of footprint elsewhere too.
0:19
K-360 test drive requires payment. All the initial options appear paid. I need to find another way in. Verify inbox — okay, that's security. Can I get started? I still need to buy something. Oh — this one I can test drive. A little bumpy to get started, but it matches the brand: rounded rectangles, bright colors, free resources.
1:35
Let's jump into Create. Quick Kahoot. We can generate from PDF, from a topic, or blank canvas. These are AI-assisted — we'll try generating from a topic: a series of polls about who is the best Ninja Turtle. Three AI tries left. Giving it a moment.
3:15
Got it — Favorite Turtle, Weapon Mastery, Jokes, Smartest, Fighter. Very bright, heavy full-background images — I like those. Generation took a bit longer, probably because of image retrieval or generation. We get to pick which questions to add. I'm adding Leader, mask color, team strategist, pizza partner energy. Saving.
5:01
It wants us to upgrade. Let's do the thing first. Classic mode — start. Generating a pin — that's a long pin, but we can use the camera to join. Picking a nickname. Get started.
6:20
First poll: What's your current favorite turtle? On my device I just see colored squares — I have to match them up to the answers on the main screen. Let's say Leo. Small bars appear. Next question: Who wins the leadership? Let's say Michelangelo — definitely not right, but okay.
6:59
Leaderboard. No correct answers set so we're at zero. Multi-select — I have to submit. Now I have some correct answers and a score. The AI set the correct answers — that's a nice touch. Partial credit. Intense fighter. The makeup slide looks great — the color pop really lands.
8:52
Pizza Partner Energy. Of course it should be Mikey. Podium — confetti, drumroll animation. 3,310 points, two out of six. Fun animation. Dancing. It's very bright, very colorful — the design sensibility is different from Mentimeter but it lands what it's going for.
9:52
I can look at the summary, rate the Kahoot, say if I learned something, and whether I'd recommend it. That's a nice touch. Upgrade options: Pro Plus — 1,000 participants at $4.68/year. Cheaper option at $2.28 for 50 participants. Goes from 50 to 200 to 1,000 to 2,000. This was fun — Kahoot's famous for that.
Wooclap
Video transcript – Wooclap
Alright, we're back — this time Wooclap. Just set up a login, dropped here. What are we going to use it for? Work. Making another collection of polls on the same topic.
0:19
I'll give it a role, leave the org name blank, heard about it on the web. Build your first interactive Wooclap event. Start from scratch — is there an AI option? Let's see. Create using AI — but I didn't notice that at first. There are categories of different types. I like the way these look.
1:36
Start with AI. Some categories. No AI on the free plan — that's what the power-up icon means. We'll make polls the old-fashioned way. No problem. Tabs are a little slow.
2:36
Looks like what we want. Save. We have to have a correct answer — okay, I'll mark all as correct since it's an opinion question. Need to check multiple answers. Got it. One more question: who's the best leader? Leo. Tabs still a little slow.
3:48
Start this event. Join with another device. Picks up cookies. We haven't started a vote yet — let's go to next. Now we have a poll up. Who's the favorite? Picked, submitted. That's snappy. Next one — best leader. Leo. Submit. Not used to the submit step but it looks good.
5:03
If I copy the link I can answer again from another session. Joining up off to the side. Who would make the best leader? Don — and now we see the bar go halfway across. Percentage and count are both visible, clearly laid out. Took about the same amount of time as the others.
5:52
Let's look at pricing before I go. On free: two questions per event, unlimited events. Unclear how many participants can respond. Paid tier gives unlimited questions. Team and advanced tiers also available. That all checks out — that's Wooclap.
Mentimeter
Video transcript – Mentimeter
Today we're using Mentimeter. I've set up an account and I'm logging in. Mentimeter has always been really well-designed — attractive software. Excited to take a look.
0:23
We're a company, Strategy and Executive Leadership. Okay, we want to explore. People who respond each month resets every month — looks like we get 50. We can present once a month. We'll get started with free and see how it works.
1:00
Some templates here — some require a Pro plan. I'm going to do something sillier. I could start with AI — let's try that.
1:26
A pop-up window. We'll say lighthearted, just the four turtle characters, hanging out, some polls. Let's see how long this takes.
2:30
Coming pretty quick — seven slides. Who's the best, vote and debate. All-time favorite, best leader, funniest, coolest invention, favorite turtle in one word, and a thanks-for-voting slide. These look really good. I like the white on black — definitely my style.
3:24
Starting the presentation. Joining on another device. Phillip Leo — I need to submit. Next slide: who's the best leader? Raphael.
4:24
That's making a poll with Mentimeter. It looks great. Easy to join. The AI implementation was thorough — probably more polished slides than I would have gotten with shorter prompts. It's really upfront about usage: I used one participant so far this month, and it shows me when I'll reset. That's Mentimeter.
See how Poll Everywhere compares in your setting
Try Poll Everywhere free for 30 days — no credit card required. All features included.
About this guide
This guide was researched and written by the Poll Everywhere team in February 2026. Tool assessments are based on hands-on testing by Poll Everywhere staff. User sentiment themes are drawn from public reviews on G2, Capterra, Reddit, and product community forums as of Q1 2026. Volume labels (high / moderate / low) reflect how frequently a theme appeared across sources, not weighted scores.
Security certification data is based on publicly available information; absence of listed certifications reflects the lack of public documentation, not a confirmed absence of compliance. Pricing and audience limits reflect published information as of February 2026 and are subject to change.
We update this guide when material changes occur. If you notice something inaccurate, contact us.