Poll Everywhere vs. Mentimeter (2026)
Different tools for different jobs — here's how to tell which one is yours.
Both tools run live polls. The experience diverges quickly from there. This comparison covers integrations, security, classroom and enterprise use, pricing constraints, and what users actually say after using each one.
Author transparency note:
This comparison was written by Poll Everywhere. We've aimed to give an honest account of where Mentimeter performs better, and where it doesn't. For the full picture across all seven tools in this category, see the hub page.
Best Audience Response & Live Polling Tools (2026)
The bottom line
Mentimeter is the better choice for polished, one-off presentations where visual quality and low setup time matter most. Poll Everywhere is the better choice for recurring use, PowerPoint-native workflows, LMS integration with grade passback, and organizations that require enterprise security compliance. The PowerPoint integration gap is significant: Poll Everywhere's is native and stable; Mentimeter's is widely reported as unusable.
Side-by-side comparison
|
Feature |
Poll Everywhere |
Mentimeter |
|
Best for |
Enterprise deployment, higher ed, recurring PowerPoint-native sessions |
Polished one-off presentations with minimal setup |
|
Free audience limit |
~40–50 participants |
~40–50 participants (monthly response cap) |
|
Paid audience limit |
Up to 700 (basic paid) |
"Unlimited" responses (basic paid) |
|
Native PowerPoint plug-in |
Yes — native, stable plug-in |
Add-in available; widely reported as unstable |
|
LMS / LTI support |
LTI 1.3 Advantage; Canvas Partner |
None |
|
Security certifications |
SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 + 27701 |
None publicly listed |
|
Q&A moderation |
Supported; advanced moderation in Q2 roadmap |
Basic moderation supported |
|
Anonymous participation |
Supported |
Supported — well-reviewed for anonymous feedback |
|
AI-assisted creation |
Available; best used in preparation, not live |
Available on paid plans |
Which tool is right for you?
The decision usually comes down to your use case, not the tools themselves. Here's a quick filter.
|
Choose Poll Everywhere if… |
Choose Mentimeter if… |
|
Polling needs to run natively inside PowerPoint or Google Slides without switching apps |
Your use case is occasional, standalone presentations where visual polish matters most |
|
LMS integration with grade passback is required (Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle) |
Ease of use for non-technical presenters is the top priority |
|
SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 certification is a procurement requirement |
LMS integration and security compliance are not requirements |
|
Sessions are recurring and content needs to be reused and tracked over time |
Setup time needs to be under a minute with no slide deck integration |
How each tool performs by scenario
Both tools can handle basic polling. The differences show up in specific conditions. Below is a direct comparison across the six use cases covered in our hands-on testing.
|
Scenario |
Poll Everywhere |
Mentimeter |
|
Teaching a class |
Yes — LaTeX supported, native slide integration, reusable polls, no per-question caps. LMS grade passback available. |
Yes for small/infrequent classes — but monthly response caps constrain regular large-section use. No LMS integration. |
|
All courses at a university |
Yes — LTI 1.3, Canvas Partner, SSO available, SOC 2 certified. Scales for departmental deployment. |
Limited — no LMS or LTI integrations. Reporting is manual. No publicly listed security certifications for institutional procurement. |
|
Team meeting |
Yes — works well for professional meetings. PowerPoint-native reduces context switching. Best used with prep. |
Very well — one of Mentimeter's strongest use cases. Templates and AI setup make it fast and polished for small meetings. |
|
Company-wide Q&A |
Yes — scales to large audiences. Voting and ranking features work. Advanced AI moderation in Q2 roadmap. |
Best for curated, design-forward sessions — not built for high-volume open-ended Q&A. |
|
New employee onboarding |
Yes — sessions reuse across cohorts, engagement data reviewable. Setup can feel heavy for very small groups. |
Yes — low prep and polished look work well for icebreakers and small onboarding groups. |
|
Conference presentation |
Yes — reliable at scale. Audience joins via QR or link, no accounts needed. Know your participant count. |
Yes — especially when visual polish matters and audience size is predictable. Monthly limits can spike at large events. |
Watch our unedited first-time tests of both tools:
Poll Everywhere
Mentimeter
Pricing and limits
Poll Everywhere:
Poll Everywhere's free plan supports up to ~40–50 participants. The basic paid plan scales to 700 participants and includes LMS integrations and reporting. Enterprise plans add SSO, SCIM, advanced admin controls, and dedicated support. All-access trial available for 30 days.
Mentimeter:
Mentimeter's free plan imposes monthly response limits (not per-session), which constrains regular or large-group use. Paid plans unlock "unlimited" responses, expanded sharing, and branding. SSO is available on higher tiers. Enterprise procurement is required for SCIM and advanced governance.
What usually triggers a procurement conversation:
Procurement typically enters when SSO, security certifications, centralized billing, or audience sizes beyond ~700 are required. Mentimeter's lack of SOC 2 documentation creates friction in institutional and enterprise procurement conversations.
Switching between Poll Everywhere and Mentimeter
Moving from Mentimeter to Poll Everywhere:
Content created in Mentimeter (slides, questions) does not import directly into Poll Everywhere. The rebuild is straightforward for most question types — the main investment is time, not complexity. Users coming from Mentimeter often note the initial setup of the PowerPoint plug-in takes a few minutes but is stable once in place.
Moving from Poll Everywhere to Mentimeter:
Poll Everywhere content does not export to Mentimeter format. If your use case is shifting toward occasional, low-prep standalone sessions rather than recurring LMS-connected ones, the tradeoff is losing grade passback and native slide integration in exchange for faster setup.